Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1952No. 35,366PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after verdict for defendant in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.

*529Plaintiff, Jens C. Peterson, suffered serious injury in a collision with one of defendant’s streetcars about 10:30 p. m., February 12, 1948, at the west end of a viaduct which carries Glenwood avenue over the tracks of the Great Northern Railway Company and the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company in the city of Minneapolis. Plaintiff was an employe of the M. & St. L. and, at the time of the injury, was engaged in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Heiden v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Strutzel v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Wosika v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Alger, Smith & Co. v. Duluth-Superior Traction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nygren v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Konkel v. ErdmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API