Legal Opinion

Alger, Smith & Co. v. Duluth-Superior Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1904No. Nos. 14,018—(53)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, Cant and Dibell, JJ., reversing an order of the municipal court of Duluth and directing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This action was brought in the municipal court of the city of Duluth to recover damages for the loss of plaintiff’s horse, caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant in operating its street car. Trial by jury, and verdict for $75. The defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a'new trial, and appealed to the district court of the county of St. Louis from an order denying its motion. The district court made its order reversing that of the municipal court and granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial. The plaintiff appealed from the order.

The municipal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Sloniker v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Lando v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Denver City Tramway Co. v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  2. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Richardson v. GrezeszakMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. City of Boston v. Boston Edison Company, City of Boston v. Boston Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  5. McKinnon v. FullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API