Legal Opinion

Gunderson v. Havana-Clyde Mining Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Sargant county; Allen, J. Action by M. T. Gunderson against the Havana-Clyde Mining Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

At the time the transactions hereinafter referred to took place, the defendant mining company was a foreign corporation, of which the three other defendants were directors. About April 1, 1906. the plaintiff and ten other persons purchased capital stock in the mining ■company from one Ganan, also a director, but not a defendant in this action. The ten other purchasers having assigned their claims to the plaintiff, he brings this action for deceit, alleging that the sales were induced by fraudulent statements of Canan and of the corporation through its prospectus. No attempt was made to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Fargo Gas & Coke Co. v. Fargo Gas & Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stewart v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Beare v. J.A. WrightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Dorsey Machine Co. v. McCaffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Asleson v. West Branch Land Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Oil v. RiemerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Doyle v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Citizens State Bank v. SkeffingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API