Richardson v. Cardillo
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment — “ * * * on the ground that the pleadings, affidavits, memos of law, Court orders, transcript of evidence of hearings had heretofore before the defendant herein on -file in this action shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and none of the defenses set forth in the answer is sufficient in law and that plaintiff is entitled to a judgment against the Todd Shipyards Corporation for compensation benefits under the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act as a matter of law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kwasizur v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Contractors v. Pillsbury, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Eschbach v. Contractors, Pacific Naval Air Bases. Eschbach v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Steamship Terminal Operating Corp. v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944