Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schultz v. Schultz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1986No. 50487PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendants, A.Y. Schultz and Chemical Dynamics, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s peremptory writ of mandamus compelling them to produce for inspection by plaintiffs the records of Chemical Dynamics. This proceeding is the predictable, if not inevitable, result of the decision in Schultz v. Schultz, 637 S.W.2d 1 (Mo. banc 1982), which sets forth the complicated factual background of this matter.

In Schultz the court determined the ownership of 14 shares of stock of the corporation. It found three shares to be held by Jack Schultz as trustee for the Schultz family. Sol Schultz, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. SchultzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Power Process Piping, Inc. v. DaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Watkins v. CassellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Brecker v. NielsenConnecticut Superior Court · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brown v. III Investments, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Kennedy v. Continental Boiler Works, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Chemical Dynamics, Inc. v. NewfeldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Kelley v. Heritage National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API