Legal Opinion

S & H Transport, Aplt. v. City of York

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2016No. 17 MAP 2015PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice DONOHUE.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether freight brokerage services are excepted from local business privilege taxation 1 under the “public utility” exception found in Section 301.1(f)(2) of the Local Tax Enabling Act (“LTEA”), Act of December 31, 1965, P.L. 1257, as amended, 53 P.S. § 6924.301.1(f)(2). The Commonwealth Court concluded that S&H was not excepted. We affirm the Commonwealth Court’s decision because we conclude that the rates of the common motor carriers with whom S&H does business are not fixed and regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. PackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. OstroskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Holland v. MarcySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. S & H Transport, Aplt. v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Lin & Eastern Taste)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. America Condominium Association, Inc. v. Stefania M. Mardo, as Trustee of the Constellation Trust-2011Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2022
  4. Commonwealth v. McClelland, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Commonwealth v. Strunk, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API