Legal Opinion

Kemon v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 14, 1951No. Docket Nos. 20265, 20266, 20267, 20268, 20269, 20270, 20271Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Arundell, Judge:

The respondent has determined that securities disposed of by Lilley & Co. during the years in question were not capital assets within the definition of section 117 (a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code and, therefore, the gain upon their sale or exchange is taxable as ordinary income pursuant to section 22 of the Code. The relevant portion of section 117 (a) (1) defines “capital assets” as “property held by the taxpayer (whether or not connected with his trade or business), but does not include * * * property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stern Bros. & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  2. Schafer v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Wood v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Van Suetendael v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUECourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API