Regenstein & Co. v. Tyler & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Equity. Practice. Amendment. Process. Waiver. Before Judge Boynton. Pike superior court. April term, 1889. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error presented their bill, addressed to the judge of the superior courts of the Elint circuit, *278as exercising chancery jurisdiction therein, against the defendants in error, in which bill they prayed for an injunction against the defendants in error and for the appointment of a receiver, and also prayed for subpoena. Service was acknowledged by the defendants’ attorney in these words : “Due and legal service acknowledged; copy and copy process, order and all further service and notice waived.” The defendants answered this bill, and an injunction was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Manheim v. Claflin & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
3Cited by15 opinions
- Conley v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Maus v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Grice v. GriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Roberts v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.