Legal Opinion

McAuley v. Cooley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1896No. 5305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 45 Neb., 582. References as to non-liability of sureties: Miller v. Stewart, 9. Wheat. [U. S.], 680; Grant v. Smith, 46 N. Y., 95; Walrath v. Thompson, 6 Hill [N. Y.], 540; Dobbin v. Bradley, 17 Wend. [N. Y.], 422; Bonser v. Oox, 4 Beav. [Eng.], 379; Zimmerman v. Judah, 13 Ind., 286; Judah v. Zimmerman, 22 Ind., 388; Lee v. Dick, 10 Pet. [U. S.], 482; Fdmondston v. Drake, 5 Pet. [U. S.], 624; Osborne v. Van Houten, 8 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 77;…

Read the full summary

Rehearing of case reported in 45 Neb., 582. References as to non-liability of sureties: Miller v. Stewart, 9. Wheat. [U. S.], 680; Grant v. Smith, 46 N. Y., 95; Walrath v. Thompson, 6 Hill [N. Y.], 540; Dobbin v. Bradley, 17 Wend. [N. Y.], 422; Bonser v. Oox, 4 Beav. [Eng.], 379; Zimmerman v. Judah, 13 Ind., 286; Judah v. Zimmerman, 22 Ind., 388; Lee v. Dick, 10 Pet. [U. S.], 482; Fdmondston v. Drake, 5 Pet. [U. S.], 624; Osborne v. Van Houten, 8 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 77; Woodworth v. Anderson, 19 N. W. Rep. [la.], 296; Sage v. Strong, 40 Wis., '575; Henderson v. Marvin, 31 Barb. [N. Y.], 297;…

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In October, 1888, J. H. Cooley and George A. Bentley formed a copartnership, and under the firm name and style of J. H. Cooley & Co. engaged in the business of dealing in lumber and coal in the town of Holstein, this state. The firm continued its operations until on or about July 31, 1889, when it was dissolved. The written agreement or contract for the' formation of the partnership, and to govern in conducting its affairs, was, in part, as follows:

“Articles of agreement, made and entered into this 12th day of October, 1888, by and between J. H. Cooley, of Kenesaw, and G. A. Bentley, of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtin v. AtkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Strawbridge v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  3. McAuley v. CooleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Rollstone National Bank v. CarletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Eastern Railroad v. LoringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re State Treasurer's SettlementNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Territory of New Mexico v. MillsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API