Legal Opinion

State v. Andree

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 1998No. 39567-0-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The elements of animal cruelty in the first degree are set forth in RCW 16.52.205, and include intentionally causing substantial pain or physical injury to an animal or the intentional killing of an animal by a means causing undue suffering. We hold that a defendant who kills a kitten by stabbing it nine times with a hunting knife falls within the clear proscriptions of the statute and further that the term “undue suffering” is not vague. Thus, we affirm.

We consider Andree’s vagueness challenge only as the statute applies to him because RCW 16.52.205 does not involve freedoms protected by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. TalleyWashington Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. State v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State of Washington v. Marvin John TankersleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API