Legal Opinion

Payne v. Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1934No. Civ. 8087PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

This is an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while a patient in the hospital operated by the defendant.

Plaintiff went to the hospital for an abdominal operation, which was performed by his own physician. He was thereafter cared for by his physician and by nurses employed by him or his physician. Plaintiff remained in the hospital until the wound healed, when he returned to his home in Los Angeles.

Some time later plaintiff experienced great physical discomfort, and in the endeavor to find a cause for the difficulty the old incision was opened…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Moody v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Payne v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Reynosa v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hedlund v. Sutter Medical Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. South Highlands Infirmary v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Ware v. CulpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Butler v. Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Canney v. Sisters of CharityWashington Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API