Legal Opinion

Parker v. Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 23, 2003No. C2-01-1132PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1102OPINION AND ORDER

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Chief Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs bring an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. They seek the invalidation of the 2001 apportionment plan for election of the Ohio General Assembly. They allege violations of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (as amended, at 42 U.S.C. § 1973) and of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. These plaintiffs allege that minority voters, specifically African-Americans, were precluded from achieving political efficacy by the new apportionment plan.

The plaintiffs' are voters residing in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Baines v. MasielloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
  3. Rodriguez v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Session v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
  5. Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API