Wackenhut Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We reverse the judgment which limited the appellant, The Wackenhut Corporation, to a recovery of $10,619.95 in attorney’s fees against its insurer, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company.
*411The undisputed evidence reveals that Wackenhut, as was its custom during its long-standing relationship with its attorney, agreed to pay him a reasonable fee for his services in this case. The mere fact that the attorney had already billed and been paid by Wackenhut fees in the amount of $10,619.95 based on an hourly billing rate did not, contrary to the reasoning of the trial court, establish either an agreement to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Pfohl v. PfohlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Trustees of Cameron-Brown v. TavorminaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Canty v. Wackenhut CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Zorovich v. StollerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.