Legal Opinion

Zorovich v. Stoller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1974No. 73-464PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, HENRY F., Jr., Associate Judge.

Appellee was Plaintiff below and brought the present action to recover a reasonable attorney’s fee on a quantum meruit basis for legal services allegedly rendered to Appellant pursuant to an oral agreement. A jury rendered a verdict in favor of Appellee in the amount of $35,000.00, final judgment was entered thereon, hence this appeal.

The transaction giving rise to the present litigation involved the acquisition and rezoning of four lots on Brickell Avenue in Miami and was described by Appel-lee as follows:

“He asked me to acquire the property and rezone…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Provus v. ProvusSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. McGill v. CockrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Ronlee, Inc. v. PM Walker Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Novack v. NovackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Adler v. SchekterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. Zukosky (In Re Baker)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  2. Stoller v. ZorovichSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Wackenhut Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API