Legal Opinion
Urinyi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 14, 2010No. Docket 09-3398-opPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
James Urinyi, through counsel, moves for leave to file a “second or successive” motion to vacate his conviction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In a prior Section 2255 proceeding, Urinyi alleged that he had been denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney had failed to file a timely notice of appeal from his criminal judgment, and was granted relief in the form of an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The question before us is whether Urinyi’s prior successful 2255 motion, which sought only reinstatement of the right to a direct appeal due to ineffective assistance…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Pratt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Ronnie James v. James Walsh, Superintendent of Ulster Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Hom Sui Ching v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blystone v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Storey v. VasbinderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Tamara SantarelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- In Re: Billy LamptonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.