Legal Opinion

Downes v. Bidwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1901No. 507PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was an action begun in the Circuit Court by Downes, doing business under the firm name of S. B. Downes & Co.,' against the collector of the port of New York, .to recover back duties to the amount, of $659.35 exacted and paid under protest upon certain oranges consigned to the plaintiff at New York, and brought thither from the port of San Juan in the Island of Porto Bico during the…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was an action begun in the Circuit Court by Downes, doing business under the firm name of S. B. Downes & Co.,' against the collector of the port of New York, .to recover back duties to the amount, of $659.35 exacted and paid under protest upon certain oranges consigned to the plaintiff at New York, and brought thither from the port of San Juan in the Island of Porto Bico during the month of November, 1900, after the passage of the act temporarily providing a civil government and revenues for the Island…

1Opinion of the Court

182 U.S. 244 (1901)

DOWNES

v.

BIDWELL.

No. 507.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 8, 9, 10, 11, 1901.

Decided May 27, 1901.[1]

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Mr. Frederic R. Coudert, Jr., and Mr. John G. Carlisle for plaintiff in error. Mr. Paul Fuller was on Mr. Coudert's brief.

Mr. Solicitor General and Mr. Attorney General for defendants in error.

MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the above statement, announced the conclusion and judgment of the court.

This case involves the question whether merchandise brought into the port of New…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Kaufman & Sons Company v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Shields v. Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API