Legal Opinion
Nally v. Bartow County Grand Jurors
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 17, 2006No. S06A0487, S06A0568PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
Paul Nally, acting pro se, brought three separate lawsuits seeking recognition of his right, as a private citizen, to appear before the Bartow County Grand Jury to urge a return of indictments. Initially, he filed a declaratory judgment action against the district attorney and others. On May 29, 2002, the trial court entered a final order which denied relief, imposed costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to OCGA§ 9-15-14, and “enjoined andrestrained [Nally] from filing any future actions in Bartow Superior Court until such time as he complies with the sanction to pay said .. .…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- McCorkle v. Judges of Superior CourtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Thorburn Co. v. Allied Media of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Walden v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Demorest v. Roberts & Dunahoo Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Clayton County Board of Tax Assessors v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Ehlers v. Upper West Side, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Daiss v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Fritz v. ShadwichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.