Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Rutland Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, P. J.:

This action is under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act,* the plaintiff having been injured while in the service of the defendant and engaged in interstate commerce work. He was one of a bridge crew which had been repairing a bridge and was returning from the work on a gasoline motor car. Ten men were on the car including the foreman who was operating it. It suddenly jumped the track and plaintiff was injured. About four months before the accident the front axle of the car was bent in a derailment which occurred. Plaintiff was aware of this fact, having been present at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Butler v. FrazeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buckley v. Cunard Steamship Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API