Hyatt & Co. v. Clark
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Justice, J., at July Term, 1914, of Haywood. This is a motion to set aside a judgment by default final, rendered in the- Superior Court of Haywood County. His Honor refused to set aside the judgment, and the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs were doing business as Hyatt & Co., a copartnership, and engaged in the livery business and the sale of feedstuffs for animals; that the defendants were partners, doing a general logging business; that the plaintiff sold and delivered to the above named defendants, and at their request, certain amounts of feed and feedstuff, and furnished feed for the said defendants herein named for their stock, and furnished the said defendants certain conveyances at the request of the said defendants, at the times and for the prices set forth, as is set out in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Currie v. Golconda Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Witt v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Jeffries v. . AaronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Dell School v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Osborn v. . LeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Supply Co. v. . Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- School v. . PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Garner v. . QuakenbushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Baker v. . CoreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.