Legal Opinion
Graham v. Hyundai Motor America
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 7, 2006No. 1-03-0253, 1-03-0254 (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neville
delivered the modified opinion of the court: In these consolidated interlocutory appeals, plaintiffs, Amy Graham, Kenneth Royal and Jeffrey Shoemaker, 1 filed complaints against defendant, Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai), and alleged that they were sold defective vehicles. Hyundai filed motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaints predicated on section 2 — 619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 2002)), but the motions were denied. However, the trial court granted Hyundai’s request to certify the following question:
“Whether Hyundai’s informal dispute settlement procedure…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Borowiec v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Thomas E. Walton Le'ellen Walton v. Rose Mobile Homes Llc, Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Bowman v. American River Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. Nissan North America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Jones v. Nissan North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008