Legal Opinion
Grooms v. Davidson Chevrolet Oldsmobile Cadillac
Watertown City Court
Decided July 8, 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
*319OPINION OF THE COURT
James C. Harberson, Jr., J.
The plaintiff seeks $5,000 from the defendant, an automobile dealership with a service center, alleging a failure to properly determine what was wrong with her vehicle and correct the problem. The sole issue was whether the plaintiff had a cause of action when she took her vehicle in for service and the defendant’s service department failed to inform her of their ability to perform a diagnostic test that would have informed her of the reason she had been alerted by the “service engine soon” light several weeks earlier when she called the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Milau Associates, Inc. v. North Avenue Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lunn v. SilfiesNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- S & W X-Ray of Rochester, New York, Inc. v. Richard Maselli Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Mennella v. SchorkSuffolk County District Court · 1966