Legal Opinion

Mennella v. Schork

Suffolk County District Court

Decided February 3, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander W. Kramer, J.

Action by plaintiff to recover the sum of $910, predicated upon two causes of action:

1. For repairs for parts negligently supplied by the defendant.

2. For breach of warranty for parts supplied by the defendant, which were not fit for the use intended.

Defendant interposed a general denial and a counterclaim for goods sold and delivered in the amount of $439.75, with interest thereon from April 2,1965,

*450At the inception of the trial plaintiff conceded the validity of defendant’s counterclaim.

FACTS

Plaintiff was the owner of a truck which he had acquired as a used — or secondhand — vehicle in 1964.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Delo Auto Supply, Inc. v. TobinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grooms v. Davidson Chevrolet Oldsmobile CadillacWatertown City Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API