Legal Opinion

State v. O'ROURKE

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. Criminal No. 950152Published

1Opinion of the Court

544 N.W.2d 384 (1996)

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Herb O'ROURKE, a/k/a Herbert Alvin O'Rourke, Defendant and Appellant.

Criminal No. 950152.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

February 28, 1996.

Merle Ann Torkelson (argued), State's Attorney, Washburn, for plaintiff and appellee.

Wayne D. Goter (argued), of Wheeler Wolf, Bismarck, for defendant and appellant.

NEUMANN, Justice.

Herb O'Rourke appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(b). We affirm.

On February…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Levine; Concurrence · Meschke.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API