Testa v. Commonwealth

KELSEY, Judge.

The trial court convicted Joshua Mark Testa of misdemean- or obstruction of justice for threatening two deputies with violence if they attempted to arrest him. Testa argues on appeal that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence of his threats. Testa also contends his conviction rests on insufficient evidence. Finding the exclusionary rule inapplicable and the evidence sufficient, we affirm Testa’s conviction.

I

We review the facts “in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, giving it the benefit of any reasonable inferences.” Glenn v. Commonwealth, 49 Va.App.…