Legal Opinion

Gage v. Boston National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 23, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

It having become necessary for the plaintiff in the settlement of the estate to pay to the intestate’s mother Eva Dudonis, who was an heir residing in Lithuania, $500, he delivered on May 7, 1921, a check payable to the defendant bank which agreed to transmit the amount in Lithuanian reichsmarks and obtain her receipt. The “remittance order,” accepted by the plaintiff May 10, 1921, states as condition, “It is expressly agreed that the Boston National Bank acts as Agent only for the sender. . . . The Boston National Bank, its Correspondent or Agent is to forward the money from any European…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Earnshaw v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Alemian v. American Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Martin v. James Cunningham, Son & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. CoombsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  2. Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Buckman v. American Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Culmone v. American Express Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API