Legal Opinion
Electric v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1997No. 95-70931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Memorandum disposition filed August 1, 1997, is redesignated as an authored Opinion by Chief Judge Hug. The dissent to the Memorandum disposition by Judge Kleinfeld is withdrawn.
OPINION
HUG, Chief Judge
Appellant Blaylock Electric appeals from the denial by the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) of its application for an award of fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 502 et seq. (“EAJA”). Blaylock was the prevailing party in an unfair labor practices action brought by General Counsel for Region 32 of the Board (“General Counsel”). We have jurisdiction under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Certain Real Estate Property Located at 4880 S.E. Dixie Highway, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board, and Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union No. 20, Intervening v. George Koch Sons, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Lion Uniform, Inc., Janesville Apparel Division v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- CNP Mechanical, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999