Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Interstate Equipment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
The appeals at bar are from two orders of the court below. The appellants have also petitioned this court for writs to restrain the court below from proceeding with the trials of the cases and have filed a motion for a rule to show cause why such restraint should not be issued. All the cases may appropriately be treated in one opinion.
The appeals must be dismissed for the orders of the court below determined no more than that the New York corporation possessing substantially the -same name as the corporation of New Jersey originally sued by the plaintiff shall be held to answer the plaintiff.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clayton v. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Williams v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kirkpatrick, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Meltzer v. Hotel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Southern Railway Company v. Frank J. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.