Legal Opinion

Phoenix Mechanical Corp. v. London

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 20, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this action in the Justice Court to recover the sum of $2,939.34 for services rendered and equipment supplied in connection with the installation of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning at defendants’ residence. Defendants interposed a counterclaim to recover the sum of $50,000, alleging that plaintiffs work was shoddy and substandard. Almost two years after they had served their counterclaim, defendants moved, pursuant to CPLR 3217 (b), to discontinue their counterclaim without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Kaplan v. Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Kane v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Expedite Video Conferencing Services, Inc. v. BotelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. St. James Plaza v. NoteyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fulton View Realty, LLC v. ReddyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API