Legal Opinion
Matthew A. Smith v. Kyle Hobbs
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 13, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00886Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Matthew A Smith, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:26-cv-00886 v. Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson Kyle Hobbs, Defendant. ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Undersigned for consideration of Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4), and the initial screen of his Complaint (Doc. 1-1) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4) is GRANTED. The Court DENIES as moot his original request for the same (Doc.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.