Legal Opinion

In re J. E. Maynard & Co.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided December 13, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of J. E. Maynard & Company. On petition to review a referee’s order declining to approve the acts of trustees setting apart $1,600 out of the bankrupt’s assets as a homestead exemption under the state law.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

The trustee in this case set apart to E. I. Hasten $1,600 out of the sale of the stock of goods as exemption under the Constitution and laws of Georgia.

The referee declined to approve the action of the trustee in setting it apart for the reasons, as he says: Eirst, that there was no sufficient application or schedule filed; second, that there was no sufficient application for the property said to be exempt; and, third, that the purchase money, according to the testimony of the claimant and the other members of the firm, for at least half of the goods in the store at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Dix v. DixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. In re BassU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1877
  5. In re CampDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Huckabee v. StephensAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. In re JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API