Salmonsen v. Town of Rindge
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether the plaintiffs’ appeal from an order of the Board of Adjustment of the Town of Rindge after rehearing, granting a variance to the intervenor, Daniel R. Kilty, was a timely one. The problem is one of statutory construction_and the governing statute provides in pertinent part that the appeal to the superior court is to be taken “within thirty, days after the action complained of, has been recorded”. RSA 31:77. Also pertinent is RSA 31:68 which provides in part that the official actions of the board “shall be immediately filed in the office of the board and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelley v. Hopkinton Village PrecinctSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Bourassa v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- DiPietro v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
- Kusky v. LaderbushSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
- Wein v. Arlen's, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dermody v. Town of Gilford Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Downing v. Monitor Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Blue Jay Realty Trust v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Schwartz v. State Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- City of Keene v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.