Legal Opinion

Merten v. Newforth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Barton District Court. A sufficient statement of the case is contained in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

On the 1st day of March, 1887, Philip Newforth commenced his action against R. Merten and Mary Merten for a specific performance of the conveyance of real estate upon a written bond or agreement, given by the'Mertens to Martin Gutzwiler on the 12th of March, 1877, and assigned to the Mertens by Martin Gutzwiler and wife on the 7th day of May, 1884. On the 28th of March, 1887, the defendants filed a demurrer to the petition, alleging that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Upon the hearing, the demurrer was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spratly v. Putnam Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  2. Pemberton v. HoosierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shults Bread Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Kansas Torpedo Co. v. Erie Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Toplikar v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Woodward v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Shults Bread Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API