Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2010No. 05-CF-1352PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Appealing his conviction for assaulting a police officer, appellant Kelvin Martin claims the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by ordering him not to speak to his attorney about his testimony over a weekend recess that interrupted his cross-examination. We agree with appellant that this was plain error necessitating reversal.

I

Appellant was indicted and tried on one count of aggravated assault while armed and one count of assaulting, resisting or interfering with a police officer with a dangerous weapon. The charges arose when Officer Ross…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. William McCorkle and Andre Clinkscale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API