Martin v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appealing his conviction for assaulting a police officer, appellant Kelvin Martin claims the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by ordering him not to speak to his attorney about his testimony over a weekend recess that interrupted his cross-examination. We agree with appellant that this was plain error necessitating reversal.
I
Appellant was indicted and tried on one count of aggravated assault while armed and one count of assaulting, resisting or interfering with a police officer with a dangerous weapon. The charges arose when Officer Ross…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- William McCorkle and Andre Clinkscale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.