Legal Opinion

Cook v. Curtis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Allegan. (Arnold, J.) Covenant. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Action for breach of covenant.

On the fourth day of February, 1879, the defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff a warranty’ deed conveying to him village lot No. 116 and the south half of lot No. 117, in the village of Plainwell, Allegan county, Michigan. The consideration of the deed was recited therein at the sum of $800. The’covenants were that the parties of the first part were, at the time of the ensealing and delivery of the instrument,—

“Well seized of the above granted premises in fee-simple; that they are free from all incumbrances whatever; and that they will, and their heirs,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. MexiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Lewis v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stotts v. StottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Madden v. Caldwell Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wiggins v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API