Legal Opinion

Amii v. Amii

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1985No. 9784; FC-D NO. 118026PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C. J.

Plaintiff Janice Fumiko Amii (Wife) appeals a portion of the family court’s September 29, 1983 amendment of its March 3,1982 divorce decree. The relevant portion of the amendment terminated the right of Wife and the three minor children of the parties to exclusively occupy residence E-31, 4280 Salt Lake Boulevard, Honolulu, Hawaii, for ten years from March 3, 1982 and ordered it to be sold. The issue is whether the family court abused its discretion. We answer yes and reverse.

On August 6, 1981 Wife was unemployed and receiving monetary and food stamp welfare…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arakaki v. ArakakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Davis v. DavisHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Sheedy v. SheedyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Vessey v. VesseyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boulton v. BoultonHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hammonds v. HammondsMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lindsey v. LindseyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Beach v. BeachHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Jacoby v. JacobyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API