Samon v. City of Utica Zoning Board of Appeals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioners, Walter and Mary Samon, are the next-door neighbors of respondents Theodore and Jean Kondzielawa on Sends Place in the City of Utica. The Kondzielawas applied for an area variance seeking to erect a carport that would extend to within six inches of the side lot line separating their property from petitioners’ property. The City of Utica’s zoning ordinance requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. Respondent Zoning Board of Appeals, rejecting the findings and recommendations of the City…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sanzone v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Sasso v. GambleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Marino v. Zoning Board of Appeals of CheektowagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cirrito v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Alvord v. Village of Camden Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994