Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 27, 1999No. A99A0652PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Johnny Arnold appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for armed robbery and possession of cocaine, contending (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict for possession of cocaine and (2) that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offenses of robbery and robbery by intimidation. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1

On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and [Arnold] no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kovacs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Kirkland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Lemattey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Crowder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Glenard Rico Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. James Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API