Legal Opinion
In re Espinoza
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 2011No. E050459PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
Jesse Espinoza (Defendant), an inmate in state prison, petitioned the trial court for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking reversal of a decision of California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) denying family visitation privileges on the grounds that Defendant had been found guilty of narcotics distribution while incarcerated in state prison. The trial court granted the petition and ordered CDCR to reconsider Defendant’s request based only upon consideration of his conduct during his current term of incarceration and without consideration of his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Palmer, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (PC) Allen v. ClendeninDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- In re GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016