Legal Opinion
Dugdale v. Doney
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1903No. 4,277PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Erom Superior Court of Marion County; J. M. Leathers, Judge. Action by Charles P. Doney against Benjamin H. Dugdale. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, C. J.
The sole assignment of error herein is based upon the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellee insists that the motion was not seasonably filed, and that therefore no question is presented. The verdict of the jury was returned on the last day of the September term, 1901, of the Marion Superior Oourt. The motion was filed on the fifth day of the October term thereof.
“The application for a new trial may be made at any time during the term at which the verdict or decision is rendered; and if the verdict or decision be rendered on the last day of the session of any court, or on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Krutz v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- City of Evansville v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cutsinger v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joiner v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. VinyardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Richardson v. StephensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906