Legal Opinion

Maught v. Getzendanner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 1886PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Frederick County, in. Equity. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The decree pro forma, from which this appeal is taken, •annuls the residuary clause, in the will of George Richards, In this will the testator, after giving a large number of pecuniary legacies to his relatives and next of kin, gives the sum of §10 to the Reverend II. G. Bowers, and immediately following this last legacy is the clause in ■question, which reads as follows:

“ I give and bequeath and devise unto the Reverend H. G. Bowers, of Jefferson, Maryland, all the rest and residue of my estate, and desire him to use and appropriate the same for such religious and charitable purposes and ob*532je…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Church Extension of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. Smith ex rel. GuerkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  2. Isaac v. EmoryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  3. Saylor v. PlaineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  4. Ingram v. FraleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  5. Chandler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1820

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ralston v. KagariseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Johnson v. HelmerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Second National Bank v. Second National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Jones v. PattersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Pratt v. Trustees of the Sheppard & Enoch Pratt HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API