Legal Opinion
State v. Sorbo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 14, 1978PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The defendant was found guilty by a jury of having committed the offenses of burglary in the third degree in violation of § 53a-103 of the General Statutes and of larceny in the first degree in violation of § 53a-122. From the judgment rendered he has appealed.
The jury could have found that a burglary occurred at the Whalley Avenue Pharmacy in the early morning of March 23, 1974. Entry was gained through a hole that was cut in the roof and ceiling. Drugs, both controlled and noncontrolled, valued at over $2000 were taken in addition to $1986 in cash and various other items.
In the present…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- The People v. GambonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. VennardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- State v. L'HEUREUXSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.