Legal Opinion

Nectaux v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided December 6, 1926No. 1601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

This is an action for damages under the federal Employers’ Liability Law (Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665). At the conclusion of the trial the court instructed the jury to find for plaintiff, leaving to it alone the question of the amount to be awarded. Defendant has moved for a new trial, both upon the question of liability and because of the alleged excessive amount of the verdict.

The reasons orally given by the court in directing a verdict upon the question of liability I am convinced, after further consideration, are sound in law. The line of railroad upon which the injury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McSwean v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Bailey v. Louisiana & Northwest R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Ingram v. Louisiana & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Taylor v. Louisiana & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DiGiacinto v. RB Health (US) LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  2. Ledwidge v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API