Nectaux v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
This is an action for damages under the federal Employers’ Liability Law (Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665). At the conclusion of the trial the court instructed the jury to find for plaintiff, leaving to it alone the question of the amount to be awarded. Defendant has moved for a new trial, both upon the question of liability and because of the alleged excessive amount of the verdict.
The reasons orally given by the court in directing a verdict upon the question of liability I am convinced, after further consideration, are sound in law. The line of railroad upon which the injury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McSwean v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Bailey v. Louisiana & Northwest R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Ingram v. Louisiana & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Taylor v. Louisiana & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- DiGiacinto v. RB Health (US) LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Ledwidge v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025