National Labor Relations Board v. Electronics Equipment Co., Inc
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The validity of the Board’s order depends on whether the sending of the letters was a legitimate concerted activity by employees, for their mutual aid and protection, guaranteed by § 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. The Board held that it was, and that Electronics’ interference with such activity was therefore a violation of § 8(a) (1). The employer argues (and the trial examiner held) that the sending of the letters was not a protected activity, because the letters had an unlawful purpose, i. e., to coerce the employer into recognizing Local 65 at a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hoover Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Call, Burnup and Sims Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Blum v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.