Legal Opinion
Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 7, 1962No. 16588PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
This case presents a question of first impression under § 8(b) (4) (ii), a wholly new provision added by the 1959 *313amendments to the Taft-Hartley Act.1 The National Labor Relations Board found that the petitioner Union violated that provision by picketing the premises of retail stores to urge customers not to buy products of an employer with whom the Union had a labor dispute. The Union took care that the stores’ employees continued to work and that their pick-ups and deliveries were not halted. The case is before us on the Union’s petition for review and the Board’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Fruit And Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962