Legal Opinion

Russell Et Ux. v. Martin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1932No. 5888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge SHORT

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The Court of Civil Appeals of the Second District has presented the following explanatory statement accompanying the certified question appended thereto:

“J. V. Russell and wife, Opal Russell, have appealed from a judgment rendered against them as defendants in favor of Florence Martin as plaintiff, for the sum of $3,000.00, awarded as damages sustained by the plaintiff as the result of a collision between two automobiles, one driven by the plaintiff and the other by the defendant, Mrs. Opal Russell; the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Moore v. IveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Casstevens v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Davis v. HillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Continental Cas. Co. v. FountainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. City of Waco v. KillenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Herrin Transp. Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Finck Cigar Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API