Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Brookside Mills, Inc. & Raybrook Textile Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 1950Published
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
Raybrook Textile Corporation (hereinafter described as “ Raybrook ”) and Nathan Sheinman served written notice dated July 22, 1949, upon Brookside Mills, Inc. (hereinafter described as Brookside), Julius A. Krug and Thomas Epstein of “ Intention to Arbitrate ” three numbered questions stated to have arisen under the provisions of a contract dated April 16, 1948. In order to understand what is sought to be arbitrated, and whether or to what extent such arbitration should be stayed, it is necessary to carry in mind the material provisions of this contract. It was a tripartite engagement,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Navarro v. FioritaNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.