Legal Opinion

C.M. v. Rutherford County Schools

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 30, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01088Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION C.M., the Student, and B.M. and Ca.M., ) the Student’s Parents, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 3:20-cv-1088 ) RUTHERFORD COUNTY SCHOOLS. ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a state Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) finding that Rutherford County Schools (“RCS”) provided C.M. with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) during the 2018-2019 school year, as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”),

20 U.S.C. § 1414

et seq. The Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. White Ex Rel. White v. Ascension Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API