Legal Opinion

Seltzer v. Sterling Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1963No. Calendar 52, Docket 50,104PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

This law action was brought in the Macomb county circuit court to recover from defendant township the sum of $150 per lot, totaling $8,-400, paid by plaintiffs as a privilege fee for “capital improvements.” Payments were made under protest and the township was aware of the protest. The payments were in addition to water tap-in fees of $125 per lot paid under the Sterling township water ordinance. The tap-in fees are not involved in this action. In addition to the privilege fee and the tap-in fee, plaintiffs paid the water rate established by the ordinance based npon the amount of water used…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morley Bros. v. Township of CarrolltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. C.I. Mitchell & Best Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Beauty Built Construction Corp. v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gregory Marina, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. S. S. & O. Corp. v. Township of Bernards Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Home Builders Ass'n of Gr. Salt Lake v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API