Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Consolidated Cases
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion
ON PETITIONERS’ SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before WALD, Chief Judge; MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Suggestions for Rehearing En Banc of the various parties have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested only on the issue of whether the equitable sharing mechanism mandated by respondent in Order No. 500 violates the filed rate doctrine. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc. Upon…
3Cited by20 opinions
- Towns of Concord, Norwood, and Wellesley, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- American Gas Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Kansas Power and Light Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company Transwestern Pipeline Company Southern California Gas Company Texaco Inc., Texas Gas Marketing Inc., and Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc. Williams Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. Southern California Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Kansas Power and Light Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Transwestern Pipeline Company Williams Natural Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carnegie Natural Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.