Legal Opinion
Mathes v. Kelton
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 29, 1977No. 8839PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBINSON, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff Rose Mathes appeals from an adverse judgment giving defendant Etta Kelton recovery on a cross-action for a $6,000 promissory note secured by a diamond ring. Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment nunc pro tunc correcting a clerical error in the original judgment. Affirmed as modified.
Plaintiff Mathes filed suit to recover possession of certain furniture in the possession of defendant Kelton. Kelton cross-claimed on a $6,000 promissory note secured by a diamond ring, seeking foreclosure of her possessory lien on the ring. Trial was held without a jury and at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Comet Aluminum Company v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Finlay v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Meyer v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Bailey v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mathes v. KeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Halton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Boyter v. MCR Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Bragg, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- Mesa Agro v. R. C. Dove & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.